Jumping Red Lights: Safer Than Stopping?

Big ride today - nearly 80 miles playing in the hills of County Durham, getting as far as Wolsingham & then coming home via Durham and the Angel.

I had an incident at a set of lights that made me question the safety of my pedantic attitude to red lights. You see, when I ride on the road, my bike IS a vehicle, and so I must obey all the relevant laws that apply :

Junctions controlled by traffic lights

175

You MUST [i.e. it is a legal requirement] stop behind the white ‘Stop’ line across your side of the road unless the light is green. If the amber light appears you may go on only if you have already crossed the stop line or are so close to it that to stop might cause a collision.

[Laws RTA 1988 sect 36 & TSRGD regs 10 & 36]

Here’s what happened - I was in a queue of traffic waiting at a set of lights leading onto a roundabout. The lights seemed to have an unusually short green phase, and wouldn’t you know it, although only four cars had been ahead of me, as I glanced up from my head-down-bum-up-gonna-beat-these-lights position, they’d already turned to amber again before I reached the line. I yanked on the brakes and flicked back down through the gears, to stop straddling the white stop line.

As I unclipped, I realised that the car behind me was still going for it. The driver swerved around me (just), and roared off through the junction. By the time HE crossed the white line, the lights were definitely red. Gimp.

So here are my questions:

  1. Bikes don’t have rear-view mirrors as a rule. That means you can’t see if there’s someone right behind you when you try to decide if stopping on amber might cause a collision. So should I now always be an "amber gambler" to avoid the danger I can’t see, in preference for the danger I can?
  2. Does this mean for proper "vehicular cycling" though, I should just ignore the lights anyway, and drive ride like I own the road? After all, I DO pay road tax !

Workout:

  • Type: Cycle
  • Date: 04/25/2010
  • Time: 15:29:35
  • Total Time: 4:52:00.00
  • Calories: 4265
  • Distance: 78.5 miles
  • Average Speed: 16.13 mph

Filed under: 'A'-List Blogs, Assassination Attempts, Bike Culture, Blogroll, Brick, Cycle, Industrial-Strength Sarcasm, IronMan?, Ranting, Road Safety

4 Responses to “ Jumping Red Lights: Safer Than Stopping? ”

  1. townmouse on April 25, 2010 at 9:47 pm

    Well, I’d have thought that the ‘to stop might cause a collision’ clause could be brought into play here. After all, it almost did. Don’t know how that would play with the police though

  2. [...] Do The Right Thing » Jumping Red Lights: Safer Than Stopping … [...]

  3. Sabinna on April 26, 2010 at 1:31 am

    Drivers like that are forever impatient (which makes being a driver stressful, and being a cyclist so dangerous). You did everything right but this driver flipped out. Even if you continued on through, it seems that driver still would have been dangerous to you. When they invent EQ level detectors for car ignitions, everyone will be better off…

  4. Kevin Love on April 26, 2010 at 3:38 am

    I put a rear-view mirror on my Pashley Roadster Sovereign. It was cheap and is very useful when making turns. I’ve become so used to knowing what is behind me that I’ll never ride without a mirror again.